Thomas Green Case Essay Example

Thomas Green Case Essay In order to determine what course of action Davis should take, the root cause of Greens struggles at Dynamic Display (ID) must be examined. Simply stated the root cause for Greens struggles stem from a lack of power and influence and a lack of credibility; however, the contributing factors for these causes require deeper examination. To fully understand the lack of power, a brief history of both Green and Frank Davis must be analyzed. According to the Beckman article, Greens short professional background included 6 years as an account manager in the banking division of a company selling Tams to regional banks in the Southeast. He was recruited to ID as an account manager in their Hospitality and Travel Division selling self-service kiosks. Due to his outstanding performance, Green was invited to a week-long training session at the corporate headquarters where he met Shannon McDonald, the Division UP. After several conversations Green discovered there was an opening for a corporate marketing role and began lobbying for the job (Beckman Gasser, 2008). Green utilized his time to persuade McDonald that he would be a good fit for this marketing role. According to Jay Conger, the four essential steps process of persuasion are establish reducibility, frame goals on common ground, vividly reinforce your position, and con neck emotionally (Conger, 1998). Greens track record of outstanding performance gave Green the credibility he needed to initiate this discussion with McDonald. He framed his goals using the fact they both attended the university of Georgia to build rapport and gain McDonalds support. Explaining his goals to McDonald and elaborating that he wanted to make a significant impact in the company vividly reinforced his position while allowing them to connect emotionally. We will write a custom essay sample on Thomas Green Case specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Thomas Green Case specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Thomas Green Case specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer As a result, McDonald promoted Green o Senior Marketing Specialist reporting to Frank Davis (Beckman Gasser, 2008). Green was able to quickly move in to a senior-level position in what could be perceived as a short time frame with very limited experience; a typical career path to the senior marketing specialist at ID included tenure and field experience in the marketing specialist role (Beckman Gasser, 2008). Green moved into a role where he owned no currency or credibility, and was heavily dependent on both his manager and team. It was clear that Green did not have the power to effectively manage his team or work with his anger and O be effective, managers must find ways to acquire power With those on whom they are dependent. (Hill, What It Really Means to Manage: Exercising Power and Influence, 2000). It is important to note that the power An individual accrues is context-specific and hence dynamic: if the context changes, other things being equal, the individuals power Will ch ange. (Hill, Power Dynamics in Organizations, 1995). In this case, any power Green established while he was an individual account manager was lost in his new role, and he needed to find a way to grow power quickly. Unfortunately, Green possessed neither the expertise nor the track record in marketing to garner credibility with Davis and his own team, two very important characteristics needed in establishing power. Instead, Green chose to utilize a mask in order to help cover up his lack of power in the organization, further contributing to low performance in his role. According to Peter FUD and Richard Buddha, if Green had simply asked, What imperfections might he have been concealing (FUD Buddha, 2011), he would start to understand how his actions were contributing to a poor situation with his manager. By adopting the movie point of view to reflect on the situation, Green would understand how his lack of action was perpetuating his problems with his manager and allow him to recognize what changes in his behavior needed to occur. Had Green spent time reflecting on the situation, he would realize he needed to reach out to others within the organization for coaching. For example, his peers would have offered valuable insight. From an organizational and experiential perspective they could provide Green with relevant and credible direction while relaying knowledge around Davis performance expectations. McDonald could have offered valuable insight as Greens mentor and Offer ideas to help Green develop his sales strategy. Perhaps the best resource to reach out to for coaching would be Davis; Green could have learned what made Davis successful and leveraged both Davis and McDonalds positional power with the marketing specialists who reported to Green to help build credibility and establish his own power. Conversely, Greens manager Frank Davis appeared to have sufficient power and influence at a positional and personal level. For instance, his tenure with ID was 1 7 years, during which time he held various sales and marketing positions. ROR to his promotion to Director of Marketing he spent several years as a marketing specialist and a senior marketing specialist (Beckman Gasser, 2008). His tenure allowed Davis to gain the requisite knowledge and skills to perform both marketing roles prior to his recent promotion. This allowed him to maintain positional power within the organization while allowing him to build more influence throughout the organization. Credibility is a key factor in any organization, and since Green lacked credibility in his new role he was unable to successfully have an open dialogue with Davis regarding his tasks. One example involved feedback through which Davis recommended areas of improvement to Green; specifically, he expected Green to begin developing new marketing strategies for his region (Beckman Gasser, 2008). Davis set Green up for failure by using his positional power to put pressure on Green, even though he knew Green lacked the credibility with his team to complete this task. In the workplace, credibility grows out of two sources: expertise and relationships (Conger, 1998). Since he was Newton the role, he was still developing relationships which would allow him to be successful. His lack of experience reverted him from possessing the appropriate expertise to build credibility with his team. Additionally, when Green did not agree with Davis, he openly voiced his opinions to fellow employees and mana gers, and on one occasion during a budget planning meeting, Green directly challenged Davis on some of his forecasts. His relationship with Davis eventually reached a point where he purposely avoided interactions with Davis whenever he could (Beckman Gasser, 2008). If Green had successfully gained power and credibility with those he was heavily dependent, the relationship with Davis would not have deteriorated so quickly or to the extreme it did, and would have increased Greens chances for success in his current role. Failure to complete assigned tasks also hurt Greens credibility with his manager. In his former role, Green was very effective at building credibility by performing at a high level; this is evident because of the fact that .. Enron executives Quickly took notice of Greens performance and were eager to strengthen his relationship with the company (Beckman Gasser, 2008). Only through high performance and strong credibility could Green attract that kind of attention with executives. In order to build this type of credibility, Green must have met or exceeded all of the goals and objectiv es outlined for him; had he found a way to perform at that level in his new role, Green would have succeeded in gaining credibility with Davis and avoided the poor relationship with his manager. He could also have leveraged his sales experience, along with the requested information from Davis, to further build the credibility and meet his goal of making an impact at ID. Along with a lack of power and credibility, Thomas Green lacked influence. One of the key ways he lacked influence was illustrated by is inability to effectively persuade his manager. For example, when Green challenged Davis regarding the sales figures Davis presented at a meeting, Green did not have sufficient data to help support his claims that the numbers proposed by Davis were unreasonable (Beckman Gasser, 2008). For Davis, having quantitative data was very important for any discussion and would have provided Green common ground to engage in open dialogue. This also would have allowed Green the support needed for his position, and could lead to fact-based open discussion rather than an assumption-based argument. Stilling self-awareness, Green would have recognized that rather than directly challenging his manager in an open meeting, an off-line discussion would have allowed both sides avoid the risk of letting their passion control their arguments. When combined with a data-driven discussion, Green would have been able to successfully argue his points while gaining credibility with his manager. Alternative Theory E-mails Davis sent to McDonald paint a picture of an employee who is lazy and incompetent, supported by a line from an e-mail that read Thomas wastes a great deal of time complaining about the problems of selling And Numerous incidents of poor judgment and questionable behavior concerned me (Beckman Gasser, 2008). Green ineffectively dealt with office politics while unsuccessfully managing the challenges of interdependency (depending on others to get things done while they dependent on you), diversity (the differences between managers and those whom they depend on), and power gaps (the formal authority over those whom they are dependent) (Hill, Power Dynamics in Organizations, 1995). While suggestions have been made on how to improve his work within the office and with clients, Green chooses not to follow through with them. Green openly challenging Davis in a meeting set into motion the negative aspect of the law of reciprocity (do to others what they do to you) (Hill, Power Dynamics in Organizations, 1995). By making an enemy out of Davis, Green destroyed any credibility he had. He also complained about Davis to other coworkers which can slowly poison a work environment. These statements show that Davis is appropriately considering a change with Greens position, but perhaps Davis should reconsider the consequences of terminating Green. A little bit of self- reflection would show that a percentage of the blame should be focused on IM. Davis needs to take into account that his role has changed, and that he should look to lead more strategically compared to how he did as in his previous role. He should leverage the fact that Green is a rising star in the organization and Offer as much support as possible. While he has given Green specific goals, explaining his expectations to Green and helping him gain power and influence would also reflect well on Davis as a director. Although his role as a senior marketing executive is probably coming to an end, he can seek to be placed back into his former job in the organization. From there, he an continue to be mentored by McDonald and gain the crucial managerial experience. Due to the economy, Davis could theoretically easily find another person to fill Greens role; however, terminating Green would show that he is unable to develop new talent within the organization and reflect poorly upon himself. It may also take longer than anticipated to find a viable replacement for Green. As businesses are cutting back due to the economy, Davis must consider the potential revenue loss of having Greens position sit vacant. Recommendation Our recommendation is that Green be put on a performance improvement Lana and given a short leave to reflect upon the information that has been communicated to him from Davis and McDonald. During his reflection he should take a close look at the series of events that have occurred and come back to discuss with Davis. He needs to determine if he would handle his role moving forward given the knowledge he is now equipped with. He will then need to address the issue of office politics and how he sees himself in the corporate structure at Dynamic Displays. Finally, he needs to ask himself if he feels that he is a cultural fit or does he need to part ways with the company. Implementation After the appropriate paperwork is filed with human resources, Davis should have a mediated discussion with Green prior to Greens leave of absence. Assuming Green chooses to return to Dynamic Displays, the first thing he needs to do is address his work flow issues in order to restore his rapport with Davis. He can do this by completing the tasks already requested by his manager. This will be an effective way to show initiative, be a team player, and work to repair his credibility within the organization. Finally, Green should work to be a more effective listener, taking special note of when to talk and when to listen. Green should also work on not biblically challenge his superiors, even when he does not agree with their decisions.

Ed Sullivan, Variety Show Host Influenced American Culture

Ed Sullivan, Variety Show Host Influenced American Culture Ed Sullivan was a newspaperman who became an unlikely cultural force during the early decades of television. His Sunday night variety show was considered a weekly event in homes around the country. The Ed Sullivan Show is widely remembered for giving The Beatles their first exposure in America, an event in early 1964 which seemed to change the culture overnight. A decade earlier, Elvis Presley had also made a huge impression on Sullivans stage, generating a national controversy while turning many young Americans into instant fans of rock n roll. Fast Facts: Ed Sullivan Born: September 28, 1902 in New York CityDied: October 13, 1974 in New York CityKnown For: As host of a weekly variety show broadcast on Sunday nights, Sullivan had enormous influence on American show business.Parents: Peter Arthur Sullivan and Elizabeth F. SmithSpouse: Sylvia WeinsteinChildren: Betty Sullivan Besides showcasing musicians, Sullivans weekly show was marked by its eclectic, and often simply odd, array of performers. Broadway stars might perform a scene from a hit musical, nightclub comedians would tell jokes about their wives and mothers in law, magicians would perform elaborate tricks, and circus performers would tumble, juggle, or spin plates. What happened on Sullivans show became part of the national conversation. By the time his show ended in 1971, it was estimated that more than 10,000 performers had appeared. During the 1950s and 1960s a mark of success in show business meant appearing on The Ed Sullivan Show. Early Life and Career Edward Vincent Sullivan was born on September 28, 1902, in the Harlem neighborhood of New York City. His father, a customs inspector, was the son of an Irish immigrant, and his mother was an amateur painter who loved the arts. Sullivan had a twin brother who died in infancy, and as a child his family moved out of New York City to Port Chester, New York. Growing up, Sullivan was influenced by his parents love of music. He attended Catholic schools, and at St. Mary’s High School he wrote for the school newspaper and played several sports. After high school an uncle offered to pay his college tuition, but Sullivan chose to go directly into the newspaper business. In 1918 he got a job at the local Port Chester newspaper. He briefly worked for a newspaper in Hartford, Connecticut, but then moved on to New York City. In the early 1930s he became a columnist for the New York Daily News. He covered Broadway and show business in general, and began appearing on radio broadcasts. To augment his income, Sullivan would moonlight as the emcee at Times Square theaters that featured live vaudeville acts and movies. After appearing on an early television broadcast, an advertising executive thought Sullivan should host a regular TV show. On June 20, 1948, he first appeared as the host of a CBS variety show, â€Å"The Toast of the Town.† Ed Sullivan. Getty Images   Television Pioneer Sullivans show was not immediately successful, but after obtaining a new steady sponsor, Lincoln-Mercury automobiles, and a new name, The Ed Sullivan Show, it caught on. His 1974 obituary in the New York Times noted that Sullivans appeal was often baffling to anyone seeking to explain it. Even his onstage awkwardness became part of his charm. His weekly promise to the audience was that he was presenting a really big show. For decades, impressionists, playing on Sullivans peculiar diction, mimicked his catchphrase as a rilly big shew. The core of Sullivans lasting appeal was his credibility as a judge of talent. The American public came to believe that if Ed Sullivan put someone on his show they were worthy of attention. The Elvis Controversy 10/28/1956-New York, NY: Elvis Presley, rock and roll sensation, as he rehearses with his band for The Ed Sullivan Show. Bettmann Archive / Getty Images In the summer of 1956, Elvis Presley appeared on television on â€Å"The Steve Allen Show.† But it wasn’t until his appearance on Ed Sullivan’s program on September 9, 1956, that mainstream America was shocked by what they saw. (Sullivan, recuperating from a serious auto accident, didn’t host that night; actor Charles Laughton was the guest host.) Some viewers, appalled by Presley’s â€Å"suggestive† dancing, criticized Sullivan harshly. The television critic of the New York Times, Jack Gould, published a denunciation of Presley the following Sunday. Gould wrote that Presley was a â€Å"gyrating figure† generally found on the fringes of show business, and that his â€Å"bumps and grinds† could â€Å"overstimulate† teenagers. The following month, Elvis returned for a performance on the night of October 28, 1956. Sullivan was back hosting, and again criticism followed. Sullivan hosted Elvis again on January 6, 1957, but CBS executives insisted that the singer only be shown from the waist up, keeping his swiveling hips safely out of sight. Cultural Milestones on Sunday Nights Ed Sullivan with The Beatles. Getty Images Eight years later, Sullivan made more cultural history by hosting The Beatles on their first visit to America. Their initial appearance, on February 9, 1964, set ratings records. It was estimated that 60 percent of American televisions were tuned into their performance. Coming less than three months after the assassination of President Kennedy, Sullivan showcasing The Beatles seemed like a very welcome bit of fun. In the following years, Sullivan would host a number of musicians who were changing the culture, including The Rolling Stones, The Supremes, James Brown, Janis Joplin, The Doors, The Jefferson Airplane, Johnny Cash, and Ray Charles. When network affiliates and advertisers suggested he should avoid booking black performers so as not to offend viewers in the South, he refused. Sullivan’s show endured for 23 years, ending in 1971. He produced some TV specials after giving up the weekly show before becoming ill with cancer. He died in New York on October 13, 1974. Sources Ed Sullivan. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2nd ed., vol. 19, Gale, 2004, pp. 374-376. Gale Virtual Reference Library.Coletta, Charles. Sullivan, Ed (1902–1974). St. James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture, edited by Thomas Riggs, 2nd ed., vol. 5, St. James Press, 2013, pp. 6-8. Gale Virtual Reference Library.Goldfarb, Sheldon. The Ed Sullivan Show. Bowling, Beatniks, and Bell-Bottoms: Pop Culture of 20th-Century America, edited by Sara Pendergast and Tom Pendergast, vol. 3: 1940s-1950s, UXL, 2002, pp. 739-741. Gale Virtual Reference Library.

German history timeline 1848-present Assignment

German history timeline 1848-present - Assignment Example the present are delineated in the following section with a focus on explaining the importance of the events that have played a decisive role in framing a remarkable path of glory and progression in Germany’s history (Lonely Planet, 2014). The phase of 1848 was regarded as the early modern history of Germany. A crucial event in this period was revolution of German states, which was also termed as ‘March Revolution’. The revolution was focused on dissatisfaction of people with autocratic political structure of independent states of the federation that inherited German terrain of past Roman Empire. At that time, the middle class people were dedicated towards liberal ideologies, while working class people wanted essential improvements to their working and living conditions. However, in the end, the attempt of liberals to unite Germany under democratic constitution failed and Germany started rapid industrialization (BBC, 2014). The union of Germany was regarded as the key objective of the revolution that happened during 1848. The official unification of Germany into a governmentally and managerially combined nation formally occurred in the year 1871. It was an important event in the history of Germany where revolutionaries stressed on forming various state governments for an administrative assembly that would possess the accountability to form a constitution. As a consequence, Prussian Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck brought the German states together, mostly by force and united Germany appeared for the first time in history under German emperor (Berdahl, 2005). The phase of 1888 was regarded as the beginning of sovereignty of William II, the last German Emperor. During his reign, he began a trend towards colonial expansion. He also started to focus on the establishment of German navy in order to compete with Britain and assert itself as a powerful nation in the world. He had also discharged Prussian Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck and propelled Germany on a new

Not-For-Profit Decisions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Not-For-Profit Decisions - Essay Example This paper will analyze the functions of Goodwill Industries International Inc, with intent to identify the importance of decision making in non-profit organizations. Goodwill Industries is a non-profit organization founded by Dr. Edgar J. Helms in 1902. As reported in Hoovers.com, the organization aims at the welfare of lower class of the society by giving outstanding training on job, employment placement services, and training programs for disabled persons. The organization is highly concerned about the societal issues for it creates opportunities for the people having criminal background. Goodwill promises improved quality life of individuals, families, as well as of the entire communities by converting all difficulties to opportunities. For instance, with intent to create more job opportunities for unemployed people, in 2010 Goodwill launched the Donate Movement which proposed collecting and recycling unwanted and unusable household materials from various places. Goodwill has mor e than 2,500 donation places in United States and Canada. Goodwill seeks help and support from local communities and it currently operates with 165 local communities. ‘Goodwill’ thus came to be known as environmental pioneer as well as a social modernizer because of its reuse and repurposes practice.

Hitler and Big Brother Essay Example for Free

Hitler and Big Brother Essay Some totalitarian regimes can be similar in some ways but also different in others. 1984 is a book that talks about a totalitarian regime that is ruled by big brother. We can find some similarities to this totalitarian regime with the regime of Adolf Hitler. They are both totalitarian regimes that are ruled by different leaders that can convince people to follow them so they can rule a population, and make people to be subordinated to them just by persuading them. So if you look to both totalitarian regimes you can find come similarity in how they ruled the population and what their idea was, but also can find a lot of differences between bot regimes. In the novel of 1984 the author writes about the society under the powerful and omniscient Big Brother. Is an story that show us the dangers of a totalitarian government. So in the book it shows how controlling Big Brother is and also shows that in the future it would be so much more. That means that in the future the danger would be bigger. This is a similarity that Big Brother has with Adolf Hitler; both are very controlling, Hitler controlled and watched all the time the Nazis and the Jews. Both leaders besides being very controller both are obsessed with power. So both leaders needed to have everyone in control of them, because they needed that. Hitler didn’t think twice about his actions, this relates to Big Brother because he was also quick to judge and didn’t give anyone second choice, you were or equal or dead. Influencing people at a young age is one tactic used by Hitler in Nazi Germany and by Big Brother in 1984 to keep the future of their nations devoted. This type of organization makes the young ones feel like they are involved in something important. Both Hitler and Big brother have ways of brain washing the youth mind so they start following them. The spies in 1984 and the Hitler Youth in Nazi Germany grow up living the way that their dictator had set up and for the rest of their lives they will be faithful and devoted, and both dictator make them think that that way of living was the only one good for them, so for the rest of their lives they would think that was the only way of living. That is cruel because the youth don’t know what is going to happen, they don’t know if what they are doing is right or wrong. Both leaders chose youth to manipulate because is so much easier, because they still don’t know a lot of things. Hitler killed a lot of Jews during the Holocaust because he had prejudice against them. This can be related to Big brother because he had prejudice against intelligent people, and used a memory ship to erase their memory, that was his way of stopping intelligence people. Maybe this is not a similarity between them both because Big Brother didn’t kill that much people, but both have the same idea, stopping the people they had prejudice. Both leaders also use mass media to create heroic images about them. Hitler create a cult about himself by making he look god-like and infallibles. Both leaders transform their society in their revolutionary ideas using propagandas and techniques. Hitler and Big Brother presented themselves as god-like to gain the people appeal. They both are strong leaders that use their intelligence and their persuasive to play off peoples fear to gain more power.

Delia Jones Transformation in Sweat Essays -- Sweat Essays

Delia Jones' Transformation in Zora Neale Hurston's Sweat Through external conflict exhibited by three significant occasions with the antagonist and husband, Sykes Jones, Zora Neale Hurston takes her leading character, Delia Jones, through an internal change from a submissive character to an aggressive and defensive character in her short story, "Sweat." When the story opens, one finds Delia Jones on a Sunday evening washing clothes, as was her profession, and humming a tune, wondering where her husband had gone with her horse and carriage. Little did she know that within the week she would stand against her abusive husband and watch him die of the situation he would create. Delia's repose was suddenly upset by interference from her husband, Sykes, who dropped "something long, round, limp and black" upon her shoulders. Delia's worst fear was that of snakes, and her husband found joy in mocking and terrifying her. After brief argument, Sykes continued to disrupt Delia's work by kicking the clothes around and threatening throw them outside or hit her. He also mentioned a promise to "Gawd and a couple of other men" that he would no longer have white people's clothes in his house. At this she responds in a manner greatly surprising to Sykes: Delia's habitual meekness seemed to slip from her shoulders like a blown scarf. She was on her feet; her poor little body, her bare knuckly hands bravely defying the strapping hulk before her... She seized the iron skillet from the stove and struck a defensive pose, which act surprised him greatly, coming from her. It cowed him and he did not strike her as he usually did. By nightfall, Sykes had gone for the evening without saying where or when he would be bac... ...lia Jones endured fifteen years of violence, disrespect, and infidelity, and only in those last few months was she able to muster some form of resistance. Until Sykes threatened all that she had, her home and her job, she was content enough just sweating it out. However, Sykes made that grave mistake on his own accord, and when leaving Delia with nothing to lose, he found that he had set himself up for a losing battle. Delia had surrendered to him in all those years, but Sykes had finally found a way to bring out the worst in his wife, and her aggression was finally realized by defending all that she had. After such pain and endurance, one can easily recognize how Delia Jones played the lead role in a short story called "Sweat." Works Cited: Hurston, Zora Neale. "Sweat." Norton Anthology of Southern Literature. Ed. William L. Andrews. New York: Norton, 1998.

Burglary: Criminal Law and Effective Entry

Burglary is an offence under Section 9 of the Thefts Act, which is in 2 separate parts. The first sub section is s9(1)(a) which states â€Å" a person is guilty of burglary if he enters any building or part of a building as a trespasser with the intent to steal, inflict grievous bodily harm, or do unlawful damage to the building or anything in it. † The second part is s9(1)(b) which says â€Å"a person is guilty of burglary if having entered a building or part of a building as a trespasser, he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or inflicts or attempts to inflict grievous bodily harm on any person in the building†.The difference between the two subsections is the intention at the time of entry. For example s9 (1)(a) the defendant must have the intention to steal, cause GBH or do unlawful damage at the time of entry. For s9 (1)(b) what the defendant intends to do is irrelevant the prosecution must prove that the defendant committed or attempted to commit Theft or GBH. So already there are some confusions with whether or not the defendant would be guilty of Burglary under s9(1)(a) or s9(1)(b). Entry is not defined in the Theft Act, but there have been several cases that help us on what the word â€Å"Entry† actually means.The first case on Entry was the case of Collins 1972. In this case the defendant had drunk alcohol and decided he wanted to have sex. He saw a window that was open and climbed a ladder so he could have a look in. He saw there was a naked girl inside asleep on her bed. So he went down the ladder took off his clothes and climbed back up it to the girls room. She woke up and thought it was her boyfriend and helped him into the bedroom where they had full intercourse. Collins was convicted on s9(1)(a) as he entered with intention to rape.Before 2004 if someone was entering a building with the intention of rape it would be included in this section, but now it is under the Sexual Offences Act. Collins appealed to his conviction as he said that he wasn’t a trespasser when he entered the building as the girl invited him in. The Court of Appeal quashed his conviction as there was no evidence that he was a trespasser and this is what is needed to be guilty of s9(1)(a) and of course Burglary. Brown was also another case that helped clarify what was regarded as entry. The defendant was standing outside but leaning in through a shop window rummaging through the goods.His feet and lower body was outside the shop. The Court of Appeal decided that he had effectively entered the building and therefore his conviction was upheld. However in the case of Ryan the need for effective entry was not followed. In his case the defendant the got trapped in the window he was trying to climb through into a house at 2. 30 am. His head and right arm was stuck inside the house and the rest of his body was outside. This could scarcely be seen to be an effective entry. How ever the Court of Appeal upheld his conv iction as they said the jury could find that the defendant had entered.So what actually qualifies as an effective entry is discovered in these cases. They have clarified by cases like Brown that you will still be guilty of burglary even if your whole body isn’t inside the actual building. Also by cases like the Collins case if you have been invited in by anybody then you cannot be guilty of burglary as you’re not a trespasser. The Theft Act does however give a description of what is considered as a building or part of a building. All inhabited places are considered as buildings so that would include houseboats or caravans, are considered as buildings/dwellings.To be a considered as a building the structure must have some degree of permanence. The main problem for the courts, have occurred where a structure such as a portacabin for example has been used for storage or office work. Moveable structures like this can be seen as buildings even though their use in particular places is only temporary. Section 9 (4) deals with what is considered to be a building and it also says â€Å"buildings include inhabited vehicles or vessels†. Two cases that helped clarify what was considered as a building was the cases B and S v Leathley.In this case a 25 foot long freezer container had been kept in a farmyard for over two years. It was used as a storage facility. It rested on sleepers, had doors with locks and was connected to the electricity supply. This was considered a building because it had some degree of permanence as it was there for 2 years. In the case of Norfolk Constabulary v Seeking and Gould, a lorry trailer with wheels which had been used for over a year for storage, had steps providing access and was connected to electricity supply, was held not be a building.The fact that it had wheels meant that it remained a vehicle. The courts have tried to clarify what a building is but it is still very unclear as some aspects of what the courts look a t are still very difficult, such as how long the structure is there for. â€Å"Part of building† is used to cover situations in which the defendant may have permission to be in one part of the building and is therefore not a trespasser, but doesn’t have permission to be in another part of the building. An example of this is the case of Walkington.In this case the defendant went into a counter area in a shop and opened a till. This area was clearly marked by a three-sided counter. The defendant was convicted of burglary under section 9(1)(a) as he was a trespasser when he went behind the counter. The critical point in this case was that the counter area was not an area where customers were permitted to go. Just like storerooms in shops customers are allowed to be in the shop but not the storeroom. I think that the courts have clarified this very well because of the examples that have used especially the case of Walkington.And the example of people not being allowed in s torerooms but they are allowed in the shop. Also students are allowed in most places in school but they wouldn’t be allowed to stroll into their head teacher’s office. In order for the defendant to commit burglary they must enter as a trespasser. If they have permission to enter then that makes them not a trespasser as we have seen in the Collins case that I have explained above in the first paragraph. The original use of the word trespasser in law comes from the civil law.It was assumed that the meaning of trespasser would be the same as in civil law that â€Å"trespass is entry without the consent of the lawful occupier of the building†. The case of Collins made it clear that there was more required that just the entry. They needed to prove that the defendant entered knowing he was a trespasser or was reckless as to whether or not he was entering the premise of another without permission. Going beyond permission is where the defendant is given permission to en tre but then goes beyond that permission and then is considered a trespasser.This is explained in the case of the Smith and Jones. In this case Smith and his friend went to Smiths fathers house in the middle of the night and took two television set’s without the father’s permission. The father stated that his son would not be a trespasser in the house; he had a general permission to entre. They were convicted for burglary as they had gone beyond their permission to be there. This is similar to the case of Barker v R, where one person was going away and asked the neighbour to watch the house and told them where the key was. The defendant used the key to entre and steal.He was found guilty of burglary. There are many situations where a person has permission to entre for a limited purpose. For example when people go to a concert they are only allowed there for a certain amount of time. The offence of Burglary has been given a definition by Parliament, but it has been left to the courts to clarify all the key points. All the areas have been explained but some have been clarified more than others and as a consequence some areas are still very difficult to understand for example what is a building or part of a building, and going beyond permission.